Customers sit outside at a bar in the San Telmo neighborhood of Buenos Aires on Sept. 5. (Alejandro Pagni/AFP/Getty Images)
By
Sebastián Lacunza, Anthony Faiola and Terrence McCoy
September 12, 2020 at 2:48 a.m. GMT+3
BUENOS
AIRES — When ICU doctor Arnaldo Dubin left the sick and the dying at the end of
another harrowing workday last week, the scene outside made him shudder.
Clusters of
people, many without masks, were strolling and chatting under the Belle
Epoque-style balconies of the capital’s fashionable Recoleta district.
Argentina
is trying to return to “normal life” — the phrase President Alberto Fernández
used when he announced new steps to ease one of the world’s strictest
coronavirus lockdowns in July. Within days, long-cooped-up porteños were
returning to hair salons, workplaces and psychiatrists’ couches. This month,
the capital’s cafes and bars won permission to serve outside tables, bringing
the sound of clinking wine glasses and beer bottles back to the city’s grand
avenues.
For women
and children around the world, a double plague: Coronavirus and domestic
violence
But as
Argentines emerge from their shells, they’re getting sick, undoing what had
been one of the globe’s strongest performances against the novel coronavirus.
In less than two months, new cases have grown threefold, to top 12,000 a day.
“If there
are more infections, we will not be able to handle them,” said Dubin, head of
intensive care at Otamendi Hospital. “We are at our limit, and losing more and
more of our colleagues to this fight.”
Seven months after Latin America diagnosed its first case of covid-19, the region continues to rack up some of the worst numbers in the world — failing to flatten its curve as it reels from persistently high infection levels and devastating mortality rates.
Brazil,
Peru, Mexico, Colombia and now Argentina make up half the global top 10 in
total coronavirus cases. Add Chile, Bolivia and Ecuador, and Latin America
accounts for eight of the 12 countries suffering the most deaths per capita.
(The United States leads the world in coronavirus cases and deaths.)
Latin
America had time to prepare for the coronavirus. It couldn’t stop the
inevitable.
The region
suffers from a range of preexisting conditions. The population is more
urbanized than in Europe, Oceania, Asia or Africa. Covid-19 has scythed its way
through the urban slums of Sao Paulo in Brazil, Lima in Peru, Buenos Aires and
Mexico City.
Close
quarters and multigenerational households have undermined attempts at social
distancing. Inequality is high, health care uneven and safety nets limited. The
region’s many poor people must work to live, and they have routinely violated
lockdowns to eat. Porous borders have made it difficult to quarantine infected
travelers.
A Red Cross volunteer stands at Tecnopolis Park in Buenos Aires, which has been repurposed as a shelter to quarantine coronavirus patients who are asymptomatic or have light symptoms. (Natacha Pisarenko/AP)
As in the
United States, erratic leadership has also played a role, particularly in
hard-hit Brazil under coronavirus skeptic Jair Bolsonaro and in Mexico under
Andrés Manuel López Obrador. Some countries haven’t even tried contact tracing,
which health experts say is key to containing the virus.
“Here, in
the area where I live, there are huge families living all together, some in
houses, and others just share rooms,” said Daniela Fonseca, 21, a public
administration student in Colombia.
Fonseca,
her mother, brother, sister and 2-year-old son all were infected in the rundown
colonial-era home they share near downtown Bogota. They lost her 44-year-old
father to the virus in July.
But despite
rampant infections in the neighborhood, she said, “there’s still people walking
around without face masks, people on the street corners drinking, having
parties. . . . There really is a big lack of awareness.”
Indeed,
analysts say, Latin American countries have suffered from the same divisive
individualism that has hampered a unified coronavirus response in the United
States.
In
Colombia, people attended thousands of fiestas clandestinas — secret parties —
as cases exploded in July. In Peru, a mayor undermined quarantine by going out,
getting drunk, then playing dead in a failed attempt to avoid detection.
Peru took
early, aggressive measures against the coronavirus. It’s still suffering one of
Latin America’s largest outbreaks.
And in
Brazil, where the virus has infected 4.2 million and killed more than 129,000,
people have packed beaches, jammed into bars and flouted pleas to wear masks. A
survey released this week found that a plurality of respondents blamed not
Bolsonaro’s chaotic leadership nor local leaders for the country’s crippling
outbreak, but other Brazilians. National leaders who have long criticized
health guidelines as governmental overreach, meanwhile, have cheered the
rule-breakers on.
“Crowded
beaches don’t just show people’s willingness to have fun, but are also a
message to aspiring dictators,” tweeted Eduardo Bolsonaro, the president’s son.
“People know what’s best for themselves, not hypocritical government leaders
and authoritarians.”
Authorities
in Mexico blame the country’s size for an outbreak that has infected more than
652,000 and killed more than 69,000. They hired more than 45,000 doctors,
nurses and other health professionals in the early days of the crisis, and they
boast that no coronavirus victims have been denied a bed.
But critics
say Mexico’s epidemic has been more deadly than it would have been if
authorities had conducted mass testing. And while the country locked down for
70 days starting in late March, it began reopening businesses while case
numbers were still rising — in part because of pressure on the economy.
“Economic
conditions forced a reopening that was too early,” said Malaquías López
Cervantes, a public health expert at the National Autonomous University of
Mexico.
Peru now
has the highest coronavirus mortality rate per capita of any major country in
the world. But because of limited testing, even its official tally of more than
700,000 cases might be a gross underestimate. Infections, analysts say, might
be as high as 7 million.
Peru’s
disastrous performance might appear perplexing, given President Martín
Vizcarra’s initially decisive response: an early and strict lockdown that put
the economy into deep freeze. Restrictions including a national 10 p.m. curfew
remain in force. Yet poverty, decades of underinvestment in health care and
what critics say are strategic errors by the government — repressive policies
enforced by the police and military, a complete lack of contact tracing, the
failure to use targeted lockdowns for local outbreaks, and the lack of a
communication strategy — have undermined the response.
In Peru,
coronavirus patients who need oxygen resort to black market and its 1,000
percent markups
Even as
Peru struggles to control its virulent outbreak, it is facing a constitutional
crisis. Congress on Friday voted to open impeachment proceedings against
Vizcarra amid allegations, denied by the president, of his involvement in an
influence-peddling scandal.
Only 20
percent of the nearly 3.3 million coronavirus tests administered so far in Peru
have been the molecular tests that require a swab from the nose or throat,
considered the best way to diagnose patients before they become contagious.
“We are
missing too many asymptomatic people, never mind the people they have been in
contact with,” said Dionicia Gamboa, a tropical-diseases expert at Cayetano
Heredia University, Peru’s top medical school.
Argentina’s
Fernández, who took office in December, imposed a strict national lockdown in
March, halting international and domestic flights and buses, closing borders,
and requiring people to isolate themselves even in the remote cities and towns
of sparsely populated Patagonia.
At first,
it seemed to work. Cases spread in the poor, densely populated villas miserias,
or misery villages, of Buenos Aires, where residents did not have the luxury of
following the rules.
Brazil’s
densely packed favelas brace for coronavirus: ‘It will kill a lot of people.’
“More than
half of the residents in our villa have already got the virus,” said the Rev.
Guillermo Torres, who lives in Villa 31, a slum beside a railway in the
capital. The infected have included Torres and two fellow priests. “We knew it
was going to happen.”
But
national numbers remained relatively low compared with those of nearby Brazil,
Chile and Peru — a development that boosted Fernández’s approval ratings. In
one sense, the lockdown might have been too successful: The president soon
faced mounting pressure from the opposition, and part of the public and the
media, to ease the restrictions.
By May,
children in Buenos Aires were allowed to leave their homes for one hour per
weekend for “recreative walking.” In June, Fernández shifted from a policy of
“mandatory isolation” to “mandatory social distancing.” Isolation remained in
place for Buenos Aires and its suburbs, but local authorities allowed more
stores to open and some sports to resume.
As
infections edged upward, Fernández reimposed some restrictions. “They wanted to
go out and run, and they went out and ran,” he said. “Now we see the
consequences.”
How tiny
Uruguay, wedged between Brazil and Argentina, has avoided the worst of the coronavirus
But as the
economic toll of locking down mounted, he allowed a phased easing of
restrictions in July. Specifics have been left to local officials, subject to
the approval of the national government. In Buenos Aires, for example,
hairdressers, takeout service from bars and restaurants, and other professional
services were allowed to reopen.
By late
July, infections began to skyrocket in middle-class neighborhoods of the
capital and expand more deeply into the provinces. Still, diners in Buenos Aires
this month were allowed to eat at sidewalk tables at bars and restaurants.
Masks remain mandatory in public, but the rule is routinely flouted.
Other
restrictions remain. Domestic flights and long-distance buses are still idle,
and malls, cinemas, schools and universities remain closed.
Argentine
officials point to the country’s still relatively low mortality rate and say
they have managed the curve, giving the country time to respond to a crunch
period now, in part by expanding ICU beds by 41 percent since March.
The strict,
early quarantine and phased reopening “allowed the number of cases and deaths
to increase more slowly than in other countries, and thus prevented the health
care system from collapsing,” Health Minister Ginés González García told The
Washington Post in a statement.
Coronavirus
on the border: U.S. hospitals overwhelmed by patients from Mexico
But doctors
are alarmed by the massive surge in cases.
On June 7,
the country had recorded 22,794 infections.
Today, it
has counted more than 524,000.
At Otamendi
Hospital, the ICU ward is now at 100 percent capacity. Nationwide, ICU wards
are 62 percent full — compared with 45 percent in late June.
“We know that one in two patients will never
wake up again,” Dubin said.
Faiola
reported from Miami. McCoy reported from Rio de Janeiro. Mary Beth Sheridan in
Mexico City, Ana Vanessa Herrero in Caracas, Simeon Tegel in Lima, Steven
Grattan in Bogota and Lula Gonzalez in Buenos Aires contributed to this report.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario